This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: C++ PATCH: Remove old ABI support

To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH: Remove old ABI support
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:42:02 -0500
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20010212020424W.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.32.0102121502060.1034-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>

I have some spare time, and this is trivial to do.  Except for...

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 03:06:11PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> 
> The following also seem to need to be done to complete this removal:
[...]
> * lang-specs.h should lose support for -fno-new-abi.

...this.  The current lang-specs.h logic would indicate that, if -fno-new-abi
is gone, then we should always be passing -D__GXX_ABI_VERSION=100 to the
preprocessor(s).  Where do we prefer that things like this get hardcoded?
In this file, or up in cc1_options in gcc.c, or another builtin in cppinit.c
(like the proposed __cplusplus define), or...?

Phil

-- 
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.

References:
- C++ PATCH: Remove old ABI support
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: C++ PATCH: Remove old ABI support
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]