This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] releases.html
On Feb 13, 2001, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@redhat.com> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:
> What's that noise? It sounded like someone running away screaming?
> :)
:-D
> Is there any disagreement that about the only thing we could do to
> make the current Makefile based stuff worse, would be to add libtool?
(raising a hand)
Making libbackend a libtool archive wouldn't really add much
complexity. Now, doing that for libgcc would definitely be
significantly harder, because of the way libgcc is currently built.
It wouldn't be much different from libsupc++, but it would require a
separate configure run to create a libtool suitable for the target
that could be used to build libgcc. It would be a good opportunity to
clean it up.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me