This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH: 2.95.3] Fix for binutils-2.11 failure
- To: Manfred Hollstein <manfred dot h at gmx dot net>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH: 2.95.3] Fix for binutils-2.11 failure
- From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:18:25 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> Running "make check" with a snapshot from the binutils-2_11-branch
> using a gcc-2.95.3 pre-release from the gcc-2_95-branch on
> armv4l-unknown-linux-gnu showed these failures:
>
> ld/ld.log:
> /home/gnu/work/GNU/binutils-2.11-armv4l-unknown-linux-gnu/ld/../binutils/nm-new tmpdir/2.x >tmpdir/nm.out
> selective3: missing foo
> FAIL: selective3
> [...]
> /home/gnu/work/GNU/binutils-2.11-armv4l-unknown-linux-gnu/ld/../binutils/nm-new tmpdir/3.x >tmpdir/nm.out
> selective4: missing start
> FAIL: selective4
>
> Philip Blundell sent me a patch for that, which I tested today on
> trees checked out from
>
> binutils: anoncvs.cygnus.com as of 2001/02/04 11:01:57 +0100
> gcc: gcc.gnu.org as of 2001/02/04 10:51:44 +0100
>
> As a result these failures are fixed now, and no other regressions
> showed up. I'd appreciate, if you can install this patch in the
> upcoming gcc-2.95.3 release tree.
Sorry, but the door is long closed - I'll only add the minimum set of patches
necessary to get 2.95.3 out.
BTW, does this problem only affect arm-linux, or other ARM targets as
well?
Bernd