This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: pa.c clean-up
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:15:42PM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> That would indicate a problem elsewhere since there should have been
> a dependency between the insn which adjusts the stack pointer and any
> stores in the prologue which use the stack pointer in their address.
Do you have special logic for functions that have a frame pointer
as well?
The lossage I've seen before happened because there was no dependancy
between a memory addressed by the frame pointer and the stack pointer
adjustment. We have special hacks in the ia32 and ia64 ports to cope
with this.
r~