This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
> There is one issue and one potential optimisation that I can see with respect > to this patch. > > > + ;; This can only be used in a leaf function, so we do > > + ;; not need to use the PIC register. > > (define_insn "return" > > This may not be correct. The ABI indicates that the PIC register must > be correctly set when the function returns. This enables a correct return > via a stub from a shared library. If +O3 is used, rename registers may > use the PIC register if we don't have a use in the return. Remember, > the PIC register is not a fixed register any more. Hit self on head. It is fixed and as a result register rename won't touch it. -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |