This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++ PATCH]: Bug 1617
- To: nathan at codesourcery dot com
- Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH]: Bug 1617
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:24:31 -0800
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, sebor at roguewave dot com
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <3A684F84.4FEFC5DD@codesourcery.com>
Wow. What a mess.
`T*' is more specialized that `T const &'? I see, because a `T
const&' is pretty much like a `T'? Is that the thinking.
! fate = more_specialized (TREE_VALUE (champ), TREE_VALUE (fn), 99999);
What's with the 99999? Surely we need some name for this magic value?
What does 99999 signify?
+ pashing, or we can bash the ARG too. The latter, though seemingly
bashing, I think you mean. And, I personally don't like that term.
arg-bashing sounds not very PC. :-) Seriously, I think we should avoid
slang in the compiler comments; it's too hard to process for
non-native speakers, or for native speakers who aren't "real hackers".
So, let's rework the comment to explain what process you're talking
about.
Once we resolve the 99999 thing, the patch is OK.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com