This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Unicode mangling (was Re: [PATCH] Java: New C++ ABI compatibility changes.)


>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

> I'm a bit confused.  If the new ABI is multi-vendor, won't having some
> ad hoc way to handle this mean that our compiler will potentially be
> incompatible with the other vendors?  That is, shouldn't the ABI
> specify this?

Don't I wish.  However, the C++ ABI committee, against my opposition,
decided to punt the question of extended characters to the C/SVR4 ABI
folks, who of course haven't gotten around to thinking about it.  So we are
left to innovate, and hope that our solution is adopted when the C ABI
folks do get around to thinking about it.

Of course, the multi-vendorness of the ABI only applies to ia64/ELF.  All
the more reason to go with UTF8 there, since that really seems like the
sensible solution where possible.

Jason

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]