This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

do_identifier_warnings?


I'm not sure if this actually a patch or just 
result of not knowing c into it's deepest.

gcc/stringpool.c line 100
-----------------------------------------
/* 0 while creating built-in identifiers.  */
static int do_identifier_warnings;
-----------------------------------------

are static globals ensured to be initizalied to 0?

I've seen other globals beeing expliciticy initizalied to 0 in the gcc
code, however don't know how it goes to static ones, or if there is any
difference...

-- 
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]