Re: libgcc c++ support bits moved

[Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>]

On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:29:04AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> That said, if somebody wants to separate the bits back out, I don't
> see what's bad about doing that, other than that it means that you
> potentially have to ship 3 different .so's for your C++ app:
> libgcc.so, libsupc++.so, libstdc++.so.

You don't really need to move anything.  The bits are already
separate enough such that minor makefile fiddling will produce
a shared version.


r~