This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Time to drop fixinc.svr4?
- To: Bruce Korb <bkorb at cruzio dot com>
- Subject: Re: Time to drop fixinc.svr4?
- From: Robert Lipe <robertlipe at usa dot net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 22:12:20 -0600
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <3A0F4582.B8E3605C@cruzio.com>
Bruce Korb wrote:
> With solaris gone, it just leaves UnixWare and whatever
> "udk" is. What is "udk"?
The SCO Universal Development Kit. It's the code generator and
libraries from UnixWare 7 with some runtime goop to all the resulting
binaries to work on UnixWare 2 and OpenServer 5, (Why? One-shot
testing, P6 code generation, modern C++, etc.)
See also:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#ix86-*-udk
From the fixincludes view, UDK and UW7 can be treated the same. They're
*almost* treated the same elsewhere in gcc; just some paths to find
startups, includes, libraries, and so on differ.
I'd be delighted to see UW (and thus UDK) converted. I just don't have
the time to make it happen.
RJL
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/fixinc/mkfixinc.sh,v
> retrieving revision 1.25
> retrieving revision 1.26
> diff -u -r1.25 -r1.26
> --- egcs/gcc/fixinc/mkfixinc.sh 2000/11/12 01:50:39 1.25
> +++ egcs/gcc/fixinc/mkfixinc.sh 2000/11/13 00:19:37 1.26
> @@ -22,10 +22,7 @@
> ;;
>
> i?86-*-sysv5* | \
> - i?86-*-udk* | \
> - i?86-*-solaris2.[0-4] | \
> - powerpcle-*-solaris2.[0-4] | \
> - sparc-*-solaris2.[0-4] )
> + i?86-*-udk*)
> fixincludes=fixinc.svr4
> ;;