This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: C PATCH: Don't generate initializers incrementally

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: C PATCH: Don't generate initializers incrementally
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:10:26 -0800
Cc: jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20001027175908C.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0011041746520.18965-100000@jsm28.trin.cam.ac.uk> <20001104102954W.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 10:29:54AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Fascinating.  I didn't know that C99 allowed this, but what you say
> means that my change actually should make it much easier to implement
> this C99 feature.

What might help the straight data case, but not the relocation-full
case, is to have the compiler store the memory image directly, rather
than a while pile of trees.

r~

References:
- Re: C PATCH: Don't generate initializers incrementally
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: C PATCH: Don't generate initializers incrementally
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]