This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Bogus libcalls with multiple REG_RETVAL notes


On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Richard Henderson wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 07:40:22PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > Don't these go through expand_call rather than expand_library_call_value?
> > The code to generate the "equal form" notes is still present in expand_call.
> 
> All the ones that the user calls, yes.  But there are
> functions calls generated by gcc that don't go through
> expand_call.

Can you provide an example? 


Bernd


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]