This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: The -m4-nofpu fix didn't work...
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: The -m4-nofpu fix didn't work...
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 15 Sep 2000 16:48:03 -0300
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at cygnus dot com>
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009152135070.32574-100000@mahatma.cygnus.co.uk>
On Sep 15, 2000, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 15 Sep 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Sep 15, 2000, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@redhat.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm not sure what the best way to fix this would be
>>
>> Can't we just have those functions defined unconditionally in
>> m2/libgcc, even though they're only going to be used for -m4-nofpu?
> We could do that if the assembler won't choke on some m4 opcode.
If it does, maybe we could change the equivalence from `m4-nofpu=m2'
to `m2=m4-nofpu'. As long as no m4-nofpu code calls that function, of
course... Hmm, this seems dangerous.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me