This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
* H . J . Lu (firstname.lastname@example.org) [20000905 17:45]:
> Why not xxxBSD just spend some effort to make sure the main trunck is
> working for you?
You seem to completely ignore the way *BSD trees are built/updated. There
are some people that object to tracking moving targets, i.e. CVS versions.
Not all the world is Linux.
And IMHO even a good part of the Linux world would appreciate having only
one source for binutils.
Philipp Thomas <email@example.com>
Development, SuSE GmbH, Schanzaecker Str. 10, D-90443 Nuremberg, Germany
#define NINODE 50 /* number of in core inodes */
#define NPROC 30 /* max number of processes */
-- Version 7 UNIX for PDP 11, /usr/include/sys/param.h