This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [G]CSE of extended asm statements


On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
 
> *However* there isn't necessarily a single mode that will be
> correct for an ASM_OPERANDS expression -- it might have multiple
> outputs with different modes for example and since the ASM_OPERANDS
> is shared, we can't have different copies of it with different modes.

[...]

> Thoughts?

Why exactly do we share ASM_OPERANDS?  (I.e. why can't we just change
that convention?)

Bernd


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]