This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/ctors1.C and ctors2.C

To: rittle at rsch dot comm dot mot dot com
Subject: Re: PATCH: g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/ctors1.C and ctors2.C
From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: 25 Aug 2000 21:59:38 -0700
Cc: pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008251105480.7110-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><u9zom1f0ff.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com><200008260141.UAA69242@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>

>>>>> Loren James Rittle <rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> writes:

 > I don't know that we have but we should at least ensure that any test
 > that merely prints FAIL on stdout also calls abort() or exit(1)
 > (abort() appears to be used far more often).

Yes, and that's why I fixed all of them on Tuesday to exit(1) as well as
printing FAIL.

Jason

References:
- PATCH: g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/ctors1.C and ctors2.C
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: PATCH: g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/ctors1.C and ctors2.C
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: PATCH: g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/ctors1.C and ctors2.C
  - From: Loren James Rittle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]