This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: emit_group_store vs complex

To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: emit_group_store vs complex
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 00:36:01 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20000807013756.A27352@cygnus.com> <jmittcnre4.fsf@envy.cygnus.com>

On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 12:28:19AM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote:
> Hmmm.  Can anyone say what MEM_IN_STRUCT_P is _for_?

Alias analysis.  It's been debated to no useful conclusion
whether alias sets completely subsume MEM_IN_STRUCT_P.  But
no one's done benchmarking either, to my knowledge.


r~

References:
- emit_group_store vs complex
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: emit_group_store vs complex
  - From: Geoff Keating

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]