This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: SUBREGs and modes
- To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: SUBREGs and modes
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:04:54 +0200
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20000802174932.A20604@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200008021613.RAA25138@phal.cygnus.co.uk> <20000802182923.B20604@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <jm66pj78q0.fsf@envy.cygnus.com>
>
> Actually, we don't. It used to be that when cross-compiling you could
> get constructs like:
>
> (subreg:SF (const_int 0x40800000) 0)
Isn't SFmode subreg prohibited completely?
What is the main purpose to make such constructs with cross-compiling?
Honza