This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH: Re-enable building libg++

To: Manfred Hollstein <manfred dot h at gmx dot net>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Re-enable building libg++
From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: 02 Aug 2000 10:22:55 -0700
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <14727.9674.312443.785543@saturn.hollstein.net><u9n1iwu2au.fsf@yorick.soma.redhat.com><14727.54405.217821.273777@saturn.hollstein.net>

>>>>> Manfred Hollstein <manfredh@redhat.com> writes:

 > On , 1 August 2000, 13:58:01 -0700, jason@redhat.com wrote:
 >> What about the Makefile.in support removed by
 >> 
 >> Tue Mar 24 16:58:29 1998  Jason Molenda  (crash@bugshack.cygnus.com)
 >> 
 >>         * Makefile.in (TARGET_CONFIGDIRS, ALL_TARGET_MODULES,
 >>         CONFIGURE_TARGET_MODULES, CHECK_TARGET_MODULES,
 >>         INSTALL_TARGET_MODULES, CLEAN_TARGET_MODULES, all-target-winsup):
 >>         Remove references to librx and libg++.
 >> 
 >> ?  Isn't that necessary, too?

 > Has this actually been installed?

Apparently not.  That'll teach me to believe the ChangeLog...:)  Your patch
is OK.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Re-enable building libg++
  - From: Manfred Hollstein

References:
- PATCH: Re-enable building libg++
  - From: Manfred Hollstein
- Re: PATCH: Re-enable building libg++
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: PATCH: Re-enable building libg++
  - From: Manfred Hollstein

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]