This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Accept blanks as language separators


In article <14726.59927.366516.930897@saturn.hollstein.net> you write:
>On , 1 August 2000, 11:32:46 -0300, aoliva@redhat.com wrote:
>
>> Marc Espie was using blanks instead of commas as language separators,
>> so CXX_FOR_TARGET failed to be configured properly.  This patch fixes
>> this problem.  Ok to install?
>
>You also need to reflect this in gcc/configure.in then. Currently,
>the check there looks like this:

Actually, I've been using the older LANGUAGES instead of enable_languages,
which traditionally used whitespace as separator...

(and I've just switch to --enable-languages as well).

The question is more whether ${LANGUAGES} support should be completed or
removed completely.

Right now, we have the worst possible case, since it tends to be accepted, and
fails spectacularly in non-obvious ways later...

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]