This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
configure.in tweak
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: configure.in tweak
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:47:26 -0700
The check for -Wno-long-long wasn't using the cache or other
higher-level autoconf functions.
2000-07-17 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
* configure.in (-Wno-long-long check): Use higher-level macros.
Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.397
diff -c -p -r1.397 configure.in
*** configure.in 2000/07/17 09:23:14 1.397
--- configure.in 2000/07/17 20:46:39
*************** AC_SUBST(NO_MINUS_C_MINUS_O)
*** 332,346 ****
gcc_AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE
! AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether ${CC-cc} accepts -Wno-long-long)
! echo 'void f(){}' > conftest.c
! if test -z "`${CC-cc} -Wno-long-long -c conftest.c 2>&1`"; then
! ac_cv_prog_cc_no_long_long=yes
! else
! ac_cv_prog_cc_no_long_long=no
! fi
! rm -f conftest*
! echo "$ac_t"$ac_cv_prog_cc_no_long_long 1>&6
# If the native compiler is GCC, we can enable warnings even in stage1.
# That's useful for people building cross-compilers, or just running a
--- 332,344 ----
gcc_AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE
! AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether ${CC-cc} accepts -Wno-long-long,
! ac_cv_prog_cc_no_long_long,
! [save_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
! CFLAGS="-Wno-long-long"
! AC_TRY_COMPILE(,,ac_cv_prog_cc_no_long_long=yes,
! ac_cv_prog_cc_no_long_long=no)
! CFLAGS="$save_CFLAGS"])
# If the native compiler is GCC, we can enable warnings even in stage1.
# That's useful for people building cross-compilers, or just running a