This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] Bug in sibling call optimizations


On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 06:55:18PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 	* calls.c (store_arg): Return non-zero if sibcall_failure is
> 	desired.
> 	(expand_call): Adjust caller.
> 
> 	* gcc.c-torture/execute/20000717-4.c: New test.
> 	* gcc.c-torture/execute/20000717-1.x: Removed.

Ok.

> +	    if (store_one_arg (&args[i], argblock, flags,
> +			       adjusted_args_size.var != 0,
> +			       reg_parm_stack_space) ||
> +		(pass == 0 &&

Recall that continuing operators go at the beginning of the next line
in gcc.  You've consistently done it Linus' way throughout this patch.  ;-)


r~

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]