This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PATCH] Un-important typos ...
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: [PATCH] Un-important typos ...
- From: Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore dot Papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 21:31:23 +0200
Just a few typos corrections that are sitting in my tree for quite some time.
Believe it or not I even bootstrapped succesfully the compiler with
this patch many times, and yes, it works without any regressions... :-)
ChangeLog for gcc:
2000-06-19 Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr>
* gengenrtl.c (special_rtx): Fix typo in comment.
ChangeLog for gcc/cp:
2000-06-19 Theodore Papadopoulo <Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr>
* search.c (lookup_member): Fix typo in comment.
Index: gcc/gengenrtl.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/gengenrtl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -c -3 -p -r1.36 gengenrtl.c
*** gengenrtl.c 2000/06/12 22:45:46 1.36
--- gengenrtl.c 2000/06/23 16:26:55
*************** special_format (fmt)
*** 180,186 ****
/* Return nonzero if the RTL code given by index IDX is one that we should not
generate a gen_RTX_FOO function foo (because that function is present
! elsewhere in the compiler. */
static int
special_rtx (idx)
--- 180,186 ----
/* Return nonzero if the RTL code given by index IDX is one that we should not
generate a gen_RTX_FOO function foo (because that function is present
! elsewhere in the compiler). */
static int
special_rtx (idx)
Index: gcc/cp/search.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/cp/search.c,v
retrieving revision 1.183
diff -c -3 -p -r1.183 search.c
*** search.c 2000/06/23 01:14:40 1.183
--- search.c 2000/06/23 16:27:00
*************** lookup_field_r (binfo, data)
*** 1504,1511 ****
return NULL_TREE;
}
! /* Look for a memer named NAME in an inheritance lattice dominated by
! XBASETYPE. PROTECT is 0 or two, we do not check access. If it is
1, we enforce accessibility. If PROTECT is zero, then, for an
ambiguous lookup, we return NULL. If PROTECT is 1, we issue an
error message. If PROTECT is 2, we return a TREE_LIST whose
--- 1504,1511 ----
return NULL_TREE;
}
! /* Look for a member named NAME in an inheritance lattice dominated by
! XBASETYPE. If PROTECT is 0 or two, we do not check access. If it is
1, we enforce accessibility. If PROTECT is zero, then, for an
ambiguous lookup, we return NULL. If PROTECT is 1, we issue an
error message. If PROTECT is 2, we return a TREE_LIST whose
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Theodore Papadopoulo
Email: Theodore.Papadopoulo@sophia.inria.fr Tel: (33) 04 92 38 76 01
--------------------------------------------------------------------