This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Suggested (easier) fix to ... RE: Regressions problem (200 failures)
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: Suggested (easier) fix to ... RE: Regressions problem (200 failures)
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 18:00:20 -0700
- Cc: Donn Terry <donnte at microsoft dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, kettenis at wins dot uva dot nl, Peter dot Schauer at Regent dot E-Technik dot TU-Muenchen dot DE, kingdon at redhat dot com, gdb at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <309F4FC4705DC844987051A517E9E39B16EEFB@red-pt-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <3931BF64.18FE530C@cygnus.com>
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 10:52:52AM +1000, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> gcc-2.95.2 outputs a line note *before* the prologue (and one for the
> closing brace after the epilogue, instead of before it, as it used to be).
Err.. I missed the one about the epilogue. That's not fixed.
> By disabling the RTL-style prologue generating mechanism
> (undocumented GCC option -mno-schedule-prologue), you get back the
> traditional behaviour.
In any case, -mno-schedule-prologue doesn't exist anymore. ;-)
r~