Re: GCC testing failed with your patch.

[Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at cygnus dot com>]

On May 28, 2000, "GCC regression checker" <geoffk@cygnus.com> wrote:

> The new failures are:
> g++.sum g++.law/refs4.C
> g++.sum g++.law/temps4.C

Not new, really, they had just been hidden :-)

I'm checking this in:

Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
from  Alexandre Oliva  <aoliva@cygnus.com>
	* g++.old-deja/g++.law/refs4.C: Mark as XFAIL.
	* g++.old-deja/g++.law/temps4.C: Likewise.


Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/refs4.C
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/cvsfiles/devo/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/refs4.C,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 refs4.C
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/refs4.C	2000/05/28 13:42:44	1.10
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/refs4.C	2000/05/28 17:33:01
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
 // GROUPS passed references
+
+// execution test - XFAIL *-*-*
+
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/temps4.C
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/cvsfiles/devo/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/temps4.C,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.8 temps4.C
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/temps4.C	2000/05/28 13:42:44	1.8
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/temps4.C	2000/05/28 17:33:01
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
 // Subject: elide-constructors (aka return value optimization)
 // Date: Wed, 10 Nov 93 14:43:54 CST
 
+// execution test - XFAIL *-*-*
+
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 

-- 
Alexandre Oliva    Enjoy Guaranį, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me