This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Re: Bootstrap make -- tries to compile c++ too soon
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Bootstrap make -- tries to compile c++ too soon
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at wolery dot cumb dot org>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 18:58:52 -0700
- Cc: Donn Terry <donnte at microsoft dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, hjl at gnu dot org
- References: <309F4FC4705DC844987051A517E9E39B16EEF7@red-pt-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <20000526172418.A25210@wolery.cumb.org> <20000526183001.A30886@cygnus.com>
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 06:30:01PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 05:24:18PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > The _proper_ fix, IMHO, is to make libgcc.a, or actually libgcc2.ready,
> > depend directly on $(LANGUAGES) as well as $(GCC_PASSES).
>
> Agreed. I'd noticed that problem and fixed it in my local
> tree a week or two ago, and then misplaced the change and
> forgot about it.
Well, don't apply the patch I sent in; libgcc.mk really does need to
depend on xgcc. I missed the use of $(GCC_FOR_TARGET) in the
envariable list.
Just putting that back got me through a -j2 bootstrap, on a
single-processor machine.
zw