This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: libio/dbz won't compile (patch)

To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: libio/dbz won't compile (patch)
From: Zack Weinberg <zack at wolery dot cumb dot org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 20:01:44 -0800
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <20000120103515.D27383@wolery.cumb.org> <20000123112451O.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <m3r9f8e171.fsf@localhost.localnet>

On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 04:57:22PM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> 
> >   Ulrich has indicated a strong desire to approve all changes to
> > libio.
> 
> Testing __STDC__ seems not the right way.  This symbol leads to lots
> of trouble since it often not defined.  Why isn't there a
> HAVE_STDLIB_H?

As far as I can tell, this code doesn't include config.h.  I might
also point out that the entire dbz directory is only for testing with.

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libio/dbz won't compile (patch)
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

References:
- libio/dbz won't compile (patch)
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: libio/dbz won't compile (patch)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: libio/dbz won't compile (patch)
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]