This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1

To: oliva at lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br
Subject: Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 17:20:10 -0800
Cc: law at cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <ord7r4s95k.fsf@garnize.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20000114123044A.mitchell@dumbledore.codesourcery.com><or7lharfst.fsf@garnize.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> writes:
    >> I'm all for speeding up the compiler -- but I'm old-fashioned.
    >> Let's profile first, and attack the hot spots!

    Alexandre> But attacking the hot spots is precisely what I'm
    Alexandre> doing.  ggc-simple seems to be just too slow.

Fair enough.  I think you're right -- the best thing to do is find a
way to get page-aligned memory even if doing so is something of a
nuisance.  I'm not sure what scheme is best for the system you're on.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Speeding up ggc-simple on stage1
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]