This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: __va_copy - for compatibility [and c++ q]
>>>>> Richard Henderson writes:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 04:40:18PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> (va_copy): Define only if not STDC conformance is sought (va_copy
>> is part of ISO C99 but not of ISO C89).
> __STRICT_ANSI__ is what you want, not __STDC__, which is
> defined *all* the time. And in any case, the patch is
> just as wrong for c99 as the original was for c89.
Ok.
> I'm thinking about the following patch. C++ folks, how
> does this affect yall? Do you need va_copy with -ansi?
Thanks for looking into it. I agree, your patch handles the va_copy
problem much better.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de