This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: non-static definition after static declaration
- To: law at cygnus dot com, phdm at macqel dot be
- Subject: Re: non-static definition after static declaration
- From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 10:54:32 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
> From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
>
> In message <199911261022.LAA22961@mail.macqel.be>you write:
> > Fix :
> > As we want to be able to bootstrap gcc with old compilers, I think we
> > should add `-Wtraditional' in WARN_CFLAGS.
> I agree, even over Kaveh's objections. Fixing these kinds of problems is
> always incredibly annoying. Now if I could convince the binutils project
> to do the same thing :-)
My specific conclusion was that this flag should only be applied
against the top level gcc dir, I didn't object to the flag entirely.
I guess I'll hack something up. :-)
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Internet Solutions