This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc.c-torture/compile/990801-2.c
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: gcc.c-torture/compile/990801-2.c
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 21:28:30 -0600
- cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, oliva at dcc dot unicamp dot br, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <19990923174410.A2379@cygnus.com>you write:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 03:04:25PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > It may be OK to just let cse_insn finish in the normal fashion given that
> > there's really nothing left for it to do with (set (pc) (label). Or mayb
> e
> > the thing to do is return and not take any chances with cse_insn doing
> > anything weird when presented with a deleted insn.
>
> How about leaving the deletion of unreachable blocks
> to delete_unreachable_blocks?
That's what we do in the global cprop code. For different reasons, but it is
certainly an option.
jeff