This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GC backport, part 3



> On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 05:29:56PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >  - Can we rename "current_function" to something shorter, like maybe
> >    "cur_func"?  This is likely to avoid all sorts of formatting problems once
> >    I start getting rid of the accessor macros.
> 
> `cfun' perhaps?

I'll use this.

> The patch is ok.

I've checked it in with one additional bugfix included: the new part is the
function init_function_for_compilation which is called from
rest_of_compilation.  Without this, the compiler would use stale values of
prologue and epilogue that caused crashes later on.  This was an effect of
removing the call to init_function_start from output_inline_function;
init_function_start used to clear prologue and epilogue.  For some reason
this problem only showed up when I re-tested before installing the patch; it
didn't cause failures with last week's sources.

Bernd


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]