This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc-2.95 RPM specfile for the contrib dir
- To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Subject: Re: gcc-2.95 RPM specfile for the contrib dir
- From: Horst von Brand <vonbrand at inf dot utfsm dot cl>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 10:41:20 -0400
- Cc: egcs-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com
Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> said:
> now that the directory structure and version numbers in gcc-2.95 are fixed
> and having used it a few times now with this setup, I would like to ask if
> this can go into the contrib dir of gcc-2.95?
>
> Currently the spec is heavily linux-centric and matches the RH6.0
> egcs-1.1.2 setup closely.
Thanks! I've been wanting to write something like this for some time,
but...
OK, just some random comments:
The gcc package name sounds wrong... the current ambiguity between the gcc
C compiler and the GCC GNU Compiler Collection has to be resolved. Perhaps
by capitalization? Then call the packages GCC-<language>, i.e., GCC-C,
GCC-C++, GCC-Java, GCC-F77, GCC-chill, GCC-Ada, GCC-Pascal; and perhaps
GCC-C++-runtime et al? (It is not *-devel, AFAIU)
The Java stuff doesn't work without the Java library, you'd have to add
that (as a separate source).
I don't think it is wise to require the latest beta of binutils.
Why not "chill support from the GNU compiler collection", for instance? Or
^^^^
even "chill compiler from..."?
Writing into the SRCDIR might not be possible, better keep the log in the
OBJDIR?
If the above sounds like criticism, well, it is. I just hope to help you
making the spec file a bit better.
Again, many thanks!
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513