This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
egcs-1.1.2/sysV68 XCFLAGS update
- To: egcs-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com (egcs-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com)
- Subject: egcs-1.1.2/sysV68 XCFLAGS update
- From: "Philippe De Muyter" <phdm at macqel dot be>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 02:56:42 +0200 (CEST)
In order to compile egcs-1.1.2 on sysV68 (m68k-motorola-sysv) bootstrapped
with the native cc, I needed to apply the following patch in gcc/ :
Mon May 31 02:22:55 1999 Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be>
* config/m68k/x-mot3300 (XCFLAGS): Fixed to match stb.o, not f/stb.o.
--- ./gcc/config/m68k/x-mot3300 Sun May 30 14:25:37 1999
+++ ./gcc/config/m68k/x-mot3300 Tue May 25 23:53:15 1999
@@ -5,11 +5,13 @@
# Since ss-950318, with jump optimization enabled, "as" issues a warning
# when assembling combine.s :
# aline nnnnn : Warning: Table overflow: some optimizations lost (SDIs)
-# but later "ld" complains with
+# but later "/bin/ld" complains with
# ld: relocation entry found for non-relocatable symbol in combine.o
# and the produced "cc1" fails with SIGSEGV
+# and "/usr/local/bin/ld" merely fails with
+# collect2: ld terminated with signal 11, core dumped
# Another possible fix would be to split combine.c.
# Since ss-961013, the same happens for expr.c compiled by gcc, but not by cc;
# and for cp/decl.c; aren't those files too big ?
-# With egcs-970910, this also happens for f/expr.o and f/stb.o
-XCFLAGS=`case $@ in combine.o|expr.o|decl.o|f/expr.o|f/stb.o) echo -Wa,-j;;esac`
+# With egcs-1.1.2, this also happens for f/expr.o and f/stb.o
+XCFLAGS=`case $@ in combine.o|expr.o|decl.o|stb.o) echo -Wa,-j;;esac`