This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: m68k/regclass/regmove fun
- To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Subject: Re: m68k/regclass/regmove fun
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at upchuck dot cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 1999 11:46:26 -0600
- cc: egcs-patches at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <3708CF42.52377EB8@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>you write:
> Well, I finally got around testing this. On a simple (750-line)
> relaxation type CFD code (from someone in France) that I tend to use for
> this quick-'n-dirty sort of benchmarking, I saw a whopping improvement
> from 85.8 -> 85.6 seconds (using compiler options -O2 -funroll-loops
> -fomit-frame-pointer).
Thanks. I was hoping to see something better than that on the performance
end. But such is life.
> So I still think the prize for this year's egcs improvement still goes
> to Jim :-)
Actually, I wasn't trying to improve, but instead keep us from regressing! :-)
Thanks for the info... I'm going to go ahead and check in the patch.
jeff