This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: (Really, summarizing remaining warnings)


Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:

> 2a.  50-70 missing initializer
> 2b.  50-70 (near initialization for `???')
> 
> 	(For some reason this became a two line warning recently so
> the warn_summary script counts it twice.)  Anyway, these all (or 98%)
> appear in toplev.c and are due to the definitions of the
> TARGET_SWITCHES and TARGET_OPTIONS macros.  One simply needs to add

I did this for i386 a few months ago but intentionally didn't add
strings for flags that weren't in *.texi to call attention to the
missing doc.

> 1.  ~100 `???' might be used uninitialized in this function
> 	I would welcome volunteers for 1 and 3.  

Do we think these are now all "real" and not just GCC being unable
to see that it's untrue?


RJL


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]