Re: mips16 reg_or_0_operand doesn't allow zero

[Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin at cygnus dot com>]

Jeffrey A Law writes:
 > 
 >   In message <14008.27261.193105.483326@cetus.cygnus.com>you write:
 >   > The PREDICATE_CODES for reg_or_0_operand and se_reg_or_0_operand are
 >   > missing CONST_DOUBLE also.  I had though this was intentional, but
 >   > looking at the comment above PREDICATE_CODES it now looks like a bug.
 >   > Looking further, I see that all the uses of reg_or_0_operand and
 >   > se_reg_or_0_operand are on instructions which have constraints of "dJ".
 >   > Unless I'm understanding the J constraint, or how constraints relate
 >   > to conditions, CONST_DOUBLE's should be accepted by these guys.  So
 >   > we should actually remove the acceptance of CONST_DOUBLES from these
 >   > conditions, right?
 > The constraints do not matter, only the predicates.  ie, what is accepted
 > by "reg_or_0_operand", "se_reg_or_0_operand" must match what is found in
 > PREDICATE_CODES.

So I should add CONST_DOUBLE to reg_or_0_operand and se_reg_or_0_operand,
in addition to adding it to true_reg_or_0_operand?

                                             -gavin...