Re: segfault in init_elim_table

[Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>]

  In message <366C0CC1.ABC@acm.org>you write:
  > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
  > 
  > --------------1C541F014BF4
  > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  > 
  > hi,
  > I had a seg fault in init_elim_table
  > (http://www.cygnus.com/ml/egcs-bugs/1998-Dec/0105.html). What confuses
  > me about Jeff's response is why are we trying to eliminate registers, if
  > we're not compiling any code?
  > 
  > If we don't need to eliminate regs when we're not emitting code, then
  > why not just check current_function_decl on entry to eliminate_regs, and
  > bail out if it's NULL?
I've been concentrating on analyzing the code gen bugs :-)  This one is almost
at the top of my queue.  Having a proposed patch moves it up even higher since
it's probably less work for me :-) :-)

jeff