This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Reload patch version 3
- To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Subject: Re: Reload patch version 3
- From: Bernd Schmidt <crux at pool dot informatik dot rwth-aachen dot de>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:54:59 +0200 (MET DST)
- cc: egcs-patches at cygnus dot com, Geoff Keating <geoffk at ozemail dot com dot au>
>
> Ok, this fixed the bootstrap fail, but make check showed the following
> regressions:
>
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/950503-1.c execution, -O1
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/950503-1.c execution, -O2
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/950503-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -finline-functions
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/950503-1.c execution, -O2 -g
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/950503-1.c execution, -Os
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution, -O2
> -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/rbug.c execution, -O2
> -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
Thanks. I'll see if I can understand PPC assembly well enough to figure out
what's going on there.
> and during compile I got the following unusual warning:
> fp-bit.c: In function `__pack_f':
> fp-bit.c:542: warning: Subreg here
That's just a debugging message which I overlooked and didn't remove. It warns
about a case which appears to be rarely encountered and where I wasn't sure
I got things right.
> Additionally your patch seems to fix Geoff's pet bug ;-) asm("" : : :
> "cc"), which now compiles just fine (also part of the configure tests of
> glibc-2.0.95).
Could you explain quickly why this wouldn't work before?
Bernd