This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

SUCCESS! (was: Re: A new patch for the x86 -fpic and -fomit-frame-pointer bug )


On Sun, 26 July 1998, 10:12:44, manfred@s-direktnet.de wrote:

 > On Sun, 26 July 1998, 09:52:22, manfred@s-direktnet.de wrote:
 > 
 >  > On Sun, 26 July 1998, 01:36:26, law@hurl.cygnus.com wrote:
 >  > 
 [snip]
 >  >  > I also changed the code to allow the constants when not eliminating
 >  >  > the frame pointer, which should be safe.
 >  >  > 
 >  >  > I've installed the updated patch on the egcs-1.1 branch as well as
 >  >  > in the mainline sources.
 >  >  > 
 >  >  > Manfred -- can you try your aggressive build & test cycle to verify
 >  >  > that the problem has indeed been fixed and that others have not crept
 >  >  > i?
 >  >  > 
 >  > 
 >  > This is what I did with my last two cycles. First I ran without any
 >  > patch and got the failure, then I applied H.J.'s patch, rebuilt the
 >  > compiler, removed all in ${target} and rebuilt the runtime
 >  > libraries. A following "make check" didn't show up the failure, while
 >  > all other results kept equal.
 > 
 > Oops, should have read more careful ;-) I'm just updating my CVS
 > sources and will then run my usual build and test cycle. Test report
 > will follow!

I just finished "make check" with equal results compared to my build
yesterday with H.J.'s patch added, i.e. EVERYTHING LOOKS PERFECT NOW!

Thanks!

manfred


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]