This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
verbosity of compiler
- From: Leseratte <bookreader at gmx dot com>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 07:37:22 +0100
- Subject: verbosity of compiler
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Hello,
I'm stuck in template developing and I would like to know, whether the
verbosity of compiler output could be increased?
Especially the decisions made, that lead to certain error?
I'm quite sure, that I made some mistakes, but I don't know, how to get rid of
them.
One error message for example is this:
error: expected primary-expression before ')' token
TimerType::startTimer<mode, ps> ( );
and another looks like
error: no match for 'operator<' (operand types are '<unresolved
overloaded function type>' and 'hal::timer::TimerMode')
TimerType::startTimer<mode, ps> ( );
Its the same source line which results in different error messages.
I would like to know:
- why is the function unresolved?
How can I find out, which of my definitions where accepted by the compiler and
which are rejected?
Is there somewhat like a debugging mode or verbose mode - that outputs the
different compiler steps?
best regards
Reinhard