This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: make -k check error
- From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffriend at gmail dot com>
- To: David Kredba <nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com>, gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:18:51 +0530
- Subject: Re: make -k check error
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAJXstsDS5-P7Lgyp=8CX=pAR+n-Ka8sz0LCzFVV6iqmz_H5RXQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKOQZ8zyO=j7iB0Pz7+oQk3Wv2y=776-6PaLfrZ4rjXEZS81Vw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CALFdCy-k3iSQ65f4HOkpG717mgp8qLuKY1veRO6cnz7XJqB0vw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:31 AM, David Kredba
<nheghathivhistha@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can use a contrib/test_summary script. Call it from build dir
> pointing to a source dir. It formates the results nice way.
> As the (B)book suggests you can compare results with gcc-test-results
> mailing list.
Thanks for pointing it out.
>
> 2014/1/17 Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> <bilbotheelffriend@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi, after building gcc-4.9.0 with make bootstrap, i ran
>>> make -k check and got the following error (make bootstrap, make
>>> install work smoothly):
>>>
>>> make[3]: [check-parallel-gcc] Error 1 (ignored)
>>> make[4]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1
>>> make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2
>>> make[3]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
>>> make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
>>> make[2]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
>>> make[1]: *** [check-target-libjava] Error 2
>>> make[4]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1
>>> make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2
>>> make[3]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
>>> make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
>>> make[2]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
>>> make[1]: *** [check-target-libgomp] Error 2
>>> make[1]: Target `check-target' not remade because of errors.
>>> make: *** [do-check] Error 2
>>> make: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
>>
>> All this tells us is that some tests failed. That is fairly normal.
>> You will have to actually look at the test failures to see what
>> happened.
>>
>> Ian