This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
many failures claim "scan-not-hidden" on Solaris 10 SPARC with 4.8.2
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke at blastwave dot org>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:17:37 -0400
- Subject: many failures claim "scan-not-hidden" on Solaris 10 SPARC with 4.8.2
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <72d0f3284fd6 dot 526140cd at blastwave dot org> <72d085013255 dot 5261410a at blastwave dot org> <72d092b0b1e dot 52614148 at blastwave dot org> <72d0844721a3 dot 526141c2 at blastwave dot org> <72d0e4d64619 dot 52614200 at blastwave dot org> <72d090c25b11 dot 5261423e at blastwave dot org> <72d0fa1d604d dot 5261427c at blastwave dot org> <72d0c89e6be5 dot 526142ba at blastwave dot org> <72d08b4b5054 dot 526142f9 at blastwave dot org>
Hello all :
I am not sure of the gravity of the situation here. I have a testsuite result on Solaris 10
SPARC for gcc 4.8.2 in which 71(g++) + 30(gcc) unexpected test failures are seen and all
but two of them claim "scan-not-hidden". Otherwise I would have a nearly pristine result
set. Please see :
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-10/msg01379.html
There are only two failures there that are not claiming "scan-not-hidden" :
FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20091219 cp_lto_20091219_0.o-cp_lto_20091219_0.o link, -O3 -flto
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/lto/20091219 cp_lto_20091219_0.o-cp_lto_20091219_0.o execute -O3 -flto
I am hoping that what we see here is some evidence of another symptom that lay outside
of the GCC source and thus I can perhaps track it down.
Where would I look to get more details on these "scan-not-hidden" faults ?
Dennis