This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

many failures claim "scan-not-hidden" on Solaris 10 SPARC with 4.8.2


Hello all : 

 I am not sure of the gravity of the situation here. I have a testsuite result on Solaris 10
SPARC for gcc 4.8.2 in which 71(g++) + 30(gcc) unexpected test failures are seen and all
but two of them claim "scan-not-hidden". Otherwise I would have a nearly pristine result
set. Please see : 

 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-10/msg01379.html

There are only two failures there that are not claiming "scan-not-hidden" : 

FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20091219 cp_lto_20091219_0.o-cp_lto_20091219_0.o link, -O3 -flto
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/lto/20091219 cp_lto_20091219_0.o-cp_lto_20091219_0.o execute -O3 -flto

 I am hoping that what we see here is some evidence of another symptom that lay outside
of the GCC source and thus I can perhaps track it down. 

 Where would I look to get more details on these "scan-not-hidden" faults ? 

Dennis


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]