This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj at gmail dot com>
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- Cc: dw <limegreensocks at yahoo dot com>, Brian Budge <brian dot budge at gmail dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, "gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:16:10 +0800
- Subject: Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- References: <5177A8D0 dot 1090008 at yahoo dot com> <5179A3E5 dot 5070409 at yahoo dot com> <517A3534 dot 8040500 at redhat dot com> <CANjXV68nQLsE1D2bHY+caxpj86zd4ZuyAxiQakPLSRoMp1N=vA at mail dot gmail dot com> <517DA182 dot 1050302 at yahoo dot com> <CAKOQZ8ybbb6L_JWoqMWGABBYQCrq0cH_20yPYmevt0=u9Z3DYA at mail dot gmail dot com>
2013/4/29 Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:24 PM, dw <limegreensocks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure what constitutes a "formal review" for gcc. Is this something
>> driven by the doc maintainers? Actually, I'm kinda surprised not to have
>> heard from them.
>
> They probably haven't seen them. As described at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html , patches are normally sent to
> gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org.
I guess there is a typo?
There should be "patches are normally sent to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"~ :p
> Many GCC developers do not read gcc-help.
>
> That said, this is an area that few GCC developers know well.
>
> Ian
Hi, dw,
I also suggest to CC maintainer who is in charge of the area
when you are submitting patches to the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org.
Refer to the file MAINTAINERS under gcc source tree for details.
Sometimes maintainers may be too busy to give response quickly.
If you do not receive a response within two weeks or so,
it is also a good idea to 'PING' the mail so that people can keep chasing it.
The content and style you re-wrote for inline asm documentation is great.
Thank you for the effort to make it better and it does help reading.
Certainly some refinement need to be done back and forth with others suggestion.
I am looking forward to see your patch can be eventually approved
after refinement. :)
Best regards,
jasonwucj