This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: dw <limegreensocks at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: Brian Budge <brian dot budge at gmail dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, "gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:35:46 -0700
- Subject: Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- References: <5177A8D0 dot 1090008 at yahoo dot com> <5179A3E5 dot 5070409 at yahoo dot com> <517A3534 dot 8040500 at redhat dot com> <CANjXV68nQLsE1D2bHY+caxpj86zd4ZuyAxiQakPLSRoMp1N=vA at mail dot gmail dot com> <517DA182 dot 1050302 at yahoo dot com>
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:24 PM, dw <limegreensocks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what constitutes a "formal review" for gcc. Is this something
> driven by the doc maintainers? Actually, I'm kinda surprised not to have
> heard from them.
They probably haven't seen them. As described at
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html , patches are normally sent to
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org. Many GCC developers do not read gcc-help.
That said, this is an area that few GCC developers know well.
Ian