Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected

[Tim Prince <n8tm at aol dot com>]

On 3/6/2013 11:49 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Michele Martone wrote:
>
>
> >   . CFLAGS for gcc:
> > "-O3 -pipe -march=native -mtune=native -mavx -std=c99 -fno-unroll-loops"
> >   . CFLAGS for icc: "-O3 -xAVX -restrict -unroll=0"
> This makes a comparison "unfair" since the two compilers use different
> optimization restrictions for floating-point operations by default (GCC is
> conservative, and thus more restricted in optimizations).  See the
> documentation for -ffast-math GCC option, and floating-point flags in the ICC
> help (e.g. options -fp-model and -mp).
>
> Alexander
Setting gcc -ffast-math would still make for "unfair" comparison unless 
you compared with icc -complex-limited-range, as -ffast-math includes 
-fcx-limited-range.
The point is somewhat well taken, as -fp-model source would have to be 
added to the icc options for equivalence with the quoted gcc ones.
I don't know that icc understands -unroll=0, it's usually spelled -unroll0.

--
Tim Prince