This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Adrian Smith <adrian dot m dot smith at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:28:09 +0100
Subject: Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
References: <CALqMvmQbprNTYN2XiR_L+6YbFQU24RYrfCrhz2Qg17rJgccinA@mail.gmail.com> <CALqMvmQ=DHWn-Rx35ecc9K5WPCtnxjp5BcgR8XMwwuFd5B_Obw@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2CCE4.6060705@aol.com> <CALqMvmRY0rBkqszxAB2NwuEChZhLxcLXD6NAZXRErSM2wTiiSQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2EBA1.2070402@redhat.com> <CALqMvmT5iGHhppC5JufU+Q-56YHRzHdk6fNVFTS46YHMeDFvpg@mail.gmail.com> <4FF30FAD.1030501@redhat.com> <CALqMvmSRrg0QtUij_MzAQmg+qJezOqwHWnJgM0m8wsRnt7x8FA@mail.gmail.com>

On 5 July 2012 14:59, Adrian Smith wrote:
>
> Although I will probably have no option other than to re-write the
> code to use a different strategy for code generation, it feels wrong,
> if I've got a computer with 128GB RAM, a 64-bit operating system, many
> cores, to be limited in this way.

You can make good use of such a system without >2GB executables.

References:
- Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  - From: Adrian Smith
- Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  - From: Tim Prince
- Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  - From: Adrian Smith
- Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  - From: Adrian Smith
- Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  - From: Adrian Smith

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]