This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure

From: Ángel González <keisial at gmail dot com>
To: Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb at gmx dot de>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 19:05:01 +0200
Subject: Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
References: <4FC37103.9000300@gmx.de> <4FC38E4E.6090908@gmail.com> <4FC39097.6070901@gmx.de>

On 28/05/12 16:49, Johannes Bauer wrote:
> Thank you for trying it out... good to get confirmation that this
> isn't just the case with my arch/gcc combination. Would you mind
> sharing which platform/gcc version you've tried it out with?
I used gcc 4.7.0 on a x86_64 system (-m32 switch makes no difference).

References:
- Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  - From: Johannes Bauer
- Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  - From: Ángel González
- Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  - From: Johannes Bauer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]