This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Strongly typed enums as bit fields

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Владимир Андреев <volodya at netfolder dot ru>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:23:36 +0000
Subject: Re: Strongly typed enums as bit fields
References: <CAJXPUYLcHEO5rMjF+BJK+5oHOePvMj8zxDU7SGZP=RezL8uR1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJXPUYJT=bZdvJ5LPVna-Kvh8K2W5yLBSBX98-9=0oGWWczJyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6eHdSwPdkOFSpVGwfSuofTxjaQtPUPEyp0t6CRoovX-owozA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJXPUYJpg_=z0fF6uwMG2zEqTh9ybX9n0DNLM5QRE5PTvP3Wvw@mail.gmail.com>

2011/11/20 Владимир Андреев :
> Additionally I noted, that GCC doesn't support declaration like
>
> using NewType = OldType;
>
> which semantically equals to
>
> typedef OldType NewType;

Yes it does, but that was only added last week.

Thanks for the Bugzilla report.

References:
- Re: Strongly typed enums as bit fields
  - From: ÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÑ ÐÐÐÑÐÐÐ
- Re: Strongly typed enums as bit fields
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Strongly typed enums as bit fields
  - From: ÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÑ ÐÐÐÑÐÐÐ

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]