This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 4.6.0
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Bill Cunningham <billcun at suddenlink dot net>
- Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:56:35 +0100
- Subject: Re: gcc 4.6.0
- References: <000301cc22de$fac4b020$a9d3daad@YOUREDC1953E71>
On 4 June 2011 18:43, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> ? The compilation I just did of gcc 4.6.0 seems to have worked. I did two
> things differently. I used a build directory outside of the source
> directory. And secondly I compiled with c++ support. I used the
> --enable-languages=c,c++ switch also.
>
> ? I would rather have compiled without the c++ support. I don't use c++ much
> and it took a very long time to compile. Does anyone know which two of these
> things may have really made the difference?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2011-06/msg00066.html
Do you not believe all the documentation saying that configuring
inside the source tree might fail?
Even when doing so causes your build to fail, and not doing so causes
it to succeed?